Assessment of Climate Change Impacts on the Hydrological Behavior of the Sarbaz River Basin Using CMIP6 Climate Models

Document Type : Original Article

Author

1 Department of Civil Engineering and Water Resources Management, University of Sistan and Baluchistan, Zahedan, Iran.

10.22044/jhwe.2025.16321.1068

Abstract

This study introduces a framework for assessing climate change and flow conditions by integrating the latest climate simulations from the CMIP6 project (HadGEM3-GC31-LL model) with the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT), while also evaluating the influence of different climate model resolutions. A total of 66 hydrological and environmental flow indicators from the Indicators of Hydrologic Alteration (IHA) were calculated to assess future extreme flows in the Sarbaz River Basin, located in Sistan Province, which is particularly vulnerable to flooding. Results indicate that by the 2030–2050 period, compared to the baseline period of 1990–2019, annual precipitation, streamflow, and maximum and minimum temperatures are projected to increase by 6.9%, 9.9%, 0.8°C, and 0.9°C, respectively. Monthly precipitation and streamflow are expected to rise especially during the monsoon season (June–September) and early wet periods (December). The magnitude of minimum 1-, 3-, 7-, 30-, and 90-day flows is projected to increase by 7.2% to 8.2%, while peak flows could rise by 10.4% to 28.4%. Finally, significant differences were observed between high- and low-resolution climate models, with high-resolution models predicting an 11.8% increase in average monthly flows during November–January, compared to just 3.2% in low-resolution models.

Keywords

References

Abbaspour, K.C.; Vaghefi, S.A.; Srinivasan, R. A Guideline for Successful Calibration and Uncertainty Analysis for Soil and Water Assessment: A Review of Papers from the 2016 International SWAT Conference. Water 2018, 10, 18.
Abbaspour, K.C.; Vejdani, M.; Haghighat, S. SWAT-CUP calibration and uncertainty programs for SWAT. In Modsim International Congress on Modeling & Simulation Land Water & Environmental Management Integrated Systems for Sustainability; Modeling and Simulation Society of Australia and New Zealand: Wageningen, New Zealand, 2007; Volume 364, pp. 1596–1602
Arnold, J.G.; Srinivasan, R.; Muttiah, R.S.; Williams, J.R. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment part I: Model development. JAWRA J. Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 1998, 34, 73–89.
Arnold, J.G.; Moriasi, D.N.; Gassman, P.W.; Abbaspour, K.C.; White, M.J.; Srinivasan, R.; Santhi, C.; Harmel, R.D.; Van Griensven, A.; Van Liew, M.W.; et al. SWAT: Model use, calibration, and validation. Trans. ASABE 2012, 55, 1491–1508.
Bowden, J.H.; Otte, T.L.; Nolte, C.G.; Otte, M.J. Examining Interior Grid Nudging Techniques Using Two-Way Nesting in the WRF Model for Regional Climate Modeling. J. Clim. 2012, 25, 2805–2823.
Borah, D. & Bera, M. 2004. Watershed-scale hydrologic and nonpoint-source pollution models: Review of applications. Transactions of the ASAE, 47, 789-803.
Balti, H.; Ben Abbes, A.; Mellouli, N.; Farah, I.R.; Sang, Y.; Lamolle, M. A review of drought monitoring with big data: Issues, methods, challenges and research directions. Ecol. Inform. 2020, 60, 101136.
Betts, R.A.; Alfieri, L.; Bradshaw, C.; Caesar, J.; Feyen, L.; Friedlingstein, P.; Gohar, L.; Koutroulis, A.; Lewis, K.; Morfopoulos, C.; et al. Changes in climate extremes, fresh water availability, and vulnerability to food insecurity are projected at 1.5 ◦C and 2 ◦C global warming with a higher-resolution global climate model. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 2018, 376, 20160452.
Daniel, E. B. 2011. Watershed Modeling and its Applications: A State-of-the-Art Review. The Open Hydrology Journal, 5, 26-50.
Eyring, V.; Bony, S.; Meehl, G.A.; Senior, C.A.; Stevens, B.; Stouffer, R.J.; Taylor, K.E. Overview of the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) experimental design and organization. Geosci. Model Dev. 2016, 9, 1937–1958.
Fu, G., Barber, M. E. & Chen, S. 2010. Hydro-climatic variability and trends in Washington State for the last 50 years. Hydrological Processes, 24, 866-878.
François, B.; Schlef, K.E.; Wi, S.; Brown, C.M. Design considerations for riverine floods in a changing climate—A review. J. Hydrol. 2019, 574, 557–573.
Fu, B., Merritt, W. S., Croke, B. F. W., Weber, T. R. & Jakeman, A. J. 2019. A review of catchment-scale water quality and erosion models and a synthesis of prospects. Environmental Modeling & Software, 114, 75-97.
Giorgi, F., Coppola, E. & Raffaele, F. 2018. Threatening levels of cumulative stress due to hydroclimatic extremes in the 21st century. npj Climate and Atmospheric Science, 1, 18.
Gassman, P. W., Reyes, M. R., Green, C. H. & Arnold, J. G. 2007. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Historical Development, Applications, and Future Research Directions. Transactions of the ASABE, 50, 1211-1250.
Gassman, P.W.; Reyes, M.R.; Green, C.H.; Arnold, J.G. The Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Historical Development, Applications, and Future Research Directions. Trans. ASABE 2007, 50, 1211–1250.
Ghorbani Fard, M., 2021. Comparison and evaluation of AWBM and IHACRES models in rainfall-runoff modeling (Case study: catchment),10th International Conference on Rainwater Catchment System, ICRWC, 24-25 November 202021, University of Kurdistan, Iran. https://civilica.com/doc/1411242
Haarsma, R.J.; Roberts, M.J.; Vidale, P.L.; Senior, C.A.; Bellucci, A.; Bao, Q.; Chang, P.; Corti, S.; Fuˇckar, N.S.; Guemas, V.; et al. High Resolution Model Intercomparison Project (HighResMIP v1.0) for CMIP6. Geosci. Model Dev. 2016, 9, 4185–4208.
 
Harris, L.M.; Durran, D.R. An Idealized Comparison of One-Way and Two-Way Grid Nesting. Mon. Weather Rev. 2010, 138, 2174–2187
Journal of Hydraulic and Water Engineering
Volume 2, Issue 2
January 2025
Pages 51-71

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics