Investigating Effect of Water Hammer on Gravity Water Transmission Lines using Fiberglass Pipes

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Civil Engineering, Engineering Faculty, Islamic Azad University, Sepidan Branch Sepidan, Iran.

2 Department of Engineering, Toosab Consulting Engineering Company, Mashhad, Iran.

3 Civil Engineering, Damghan University, Iran.

10.22044/jhwe.2024.14162.1035

Abstract

This study investigates water hammer control strategies in gravity-fed water transmission systems using the drinking water pipeline from wells west of Mashhad as a case study. Key sections of the system include the transfer routes from Islamabad reservoir to Coward reservoir and from Coward reservoir to Area F reservoir, where abrupt flow stoppages have been shown to induce considerable pressure variations. The analysis reveals that sudden closures generate maximum positive pressures of 161 and 181 meters of water column, while negative pressures can drop to -10 meters, posing significant risks of structural damage to the pipeline. The research demonstrates that extending the valve closing time to at least 10 minutes substantially reduces the occurrence of extreme pressure fluctuations. Additionally, installing a pressure control valve upstream of the final valve effectively moderates peak pressures in emergency scenarios, such as sudden valve closures. These adjustments significantly enhance the system's resilience without requiring extensive or expensive shock control equipment. The findings underscore the importance of operational modifications over mechanical interventions. By implementing controlled valve operations with a closing time of 15–20 minutes and strategically integrating pressure control valves, it is possible to mitigate water hammer effects effectively. This approach not only minimizes potential damage but also reduces maintenance costs and enhances the system's longevity The results of this study have broad implications for the design and operation of gravity-fed water transmission systems. By adopting such strategies, operators can optimize system performance, ensure the safety of infrastructure, and avoid unnecessary expenditures on specialized equipment. These outcomes highlight the feasibility of combining practical operational changes with targeted engineering solutions to address common challenges in water supply systems.

Keywords

References

Afshar, A. (2008). Simulation of the water hammer phenomenon using the method of unconditional characteristic lines. International Journal of Piping and Pressure Vessels, 85(3), 123-130.
Aghamajidi, R. (2021). Investigating the factors causing Water Hammer phenomenon and methods and equipment. Shiraz, Simorgh Publishing House.
Aghamajidi, R., et al. (2021). Investigating and analyzing the sensitivity of indicators affecting the dynamic pressure of fiberglass pipes in water supply projects: Case study of the water supply project of Sanghar city, Kermanshah. Specialized Water Quarterly, 12(4), 45-58.
Ashofte, A. (1990). Hydraulics of damping currents. Tehran, Share AB Publications.
Don, J., Wood, S., Lindireddy, P. F., Boulos, B. K., & Mcpherson, D. L. (2005). Numerical methods for modeling transient flow. Journal of American Water Works Association (AWWA), 97(5), 104-115.
Ghidaoui, M. S., & Kolyshkin, A. A. (2001). Stability analysis of velocity profiles in water-hammer flows. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 127(6), 499-512.
Haghighipoor, H. (2008). Optimizing the location of surge tank with the help of genetic algorithm in electric power plants (Master's thesis). Tehran: Tarbiat Modarres University.
Karome, M. (2002). Water transfer systems. Mashhad, Ferdowsi University Publications.
Keramat, A., Tijsseling, A., Hou, Q., & Ahmadi, A. (2012). Fluid–structure interaction with pipe-wall viscoelasticity during water hammer. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 28, 434-455.
Khamlichi, A., Jezequel, L., & Tephany, F. (1995). Elastic-plastic water hammer analysis in piping systems. Wave Motion, 22(3), 279-295.
Kim, S.-G., Lee, K.-B., & Kim, K.-Y. (2014). Water hammer in the pump-rising pipeline system with an air chamber. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 26(6), 960-964.
Meniconi, S., Brunone, B., & Ferrante, M. (2012). Water-hammer pressure waves interaction at cross-section changes in series in viscoelastic pipes. Journal of Fluids and Structures, 33, 44-58.
Najmaee, N. (1996). Water Hammer. Tehran, Elm va Sanat Publications.
Safwat, H. H. (1972). On the elastic behavior of the pipe wall for water-hammer applications. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 21(1), 85-94.
Sang-Gyun, K., Kye-Bock, L., & Kyung-Yup, K. (2014). Water hammer in the pump-rising pipeline system with an air chamber. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 26(6), 960-964.
Sciamarella, D., & Artana, G. (2009). A water hammer analysis of pressure and flow in the voice production system. Speech Communication, 51(4), 344-351.
Tijsseling, A. (2007). Water hammer with fluid–structure interaction in thick-walled pipes. Computers & Structures, 85(11-14), 844-851.
Vakili Tahami, V. (2002). Water Hammer and protection systems. Tabriz, Aydin Publications.
Wang, R., Wang, Z., Wang, X., Yang, H., & Sun, J. (2014). Water hammer assessment techniques for water distribution systems. Procedia Engineering, 70, 1717-1725.
Zhou, F., Hicks, F., & Steffler, P. (2002). Transient flow in a rapidly filling horizontal pipe containing trapped air. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 128(6), 625-634.
Journal of Hydraulic and Water Engineering
Volume 2, Issue 1
July 2024
Pages 74-95

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics