Optimizing Roughness Parameters for Enhanced Hydraulic Jump Control in Ogee Spillway Stilling Basins

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Agricultural Systems Engineering, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran

2 Department of Civil Engineering, Sep. C., Islamic Azad University, Sepidan, Iran.

Abstract

This research investigates how surface roughness—characterized by the height and spacing of roughness elements—affects hydraulic jump behavior within the stilling basin downstream of an Ogee weir. Using Fluent numerical simulations, the study examines flow structures and geometric configurations around the weir, with the computational findings validated against experimental measurements obtained from a physical model constructed at the Islamic Azad University of Yasuj. The results demonstrate that the introduction of bed roughness markedly alters the characteristics of the hydraulic jump. Increasing the height of roughness elements consistently decreases the jump length and lowers the ratio of secondary to primary flow depth, a response attributed to the modified turbulence structure and enhanced energy loss induced by the roughened surface.

More specifically, the optimal arrangement—roughness elements 2 cm in height with a 2 cm spacing—was shown to shorten the hydraulic jump length by up to 40% and improve energy dissipation by approximately 35% in comparison with a smooth bed. The numerical simulations exhibited excellent consistency with laboratory observations, yielding a maximum deviation of only 0.02% in predicted water surface profiles. These quantitative outcomes confirm the strong reliability of the modeling approach and offer engineers a clear basis for designing more compact and efficient stilling basins. Strategically incorporating roughness of suitable dimensions, particularly in MVSP channels, enables the development of cost-effective structures that maintain—or even enhance—hydraulic performance. Overall, the study significantly advances understanding of how surface roughness influences hydraulic jump dynamics and provides practical design guidance for optimizing energy dissipation in modern hydraulic systems.

Keywords


Agrawal, A., & Padhi, E. (2024). Influence of bed roughness on hydraulic jump characteristics: A comprehensive review. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 150(3), 123-135.
Azamathulla, H.M., Ahmad, Z., & Ab Ghani, A. (2012). Validation of CFD modeling for hydraulic jumps using ANSYS Fluent. Flow Measurement and Instrumentation, 27, 45-52.
Beltaos, S. (2002a). Effects of bed roughness on hydraulic jump characteristics. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 29(6), 789-801.
Beltaos, S. (2002b). Shear stress in hydraulic jump. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 40(4), 509-513.
Benedict, A. (2015). Energy dissipation in hydraulic systems. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 141(5), Article 04014088.
Carollo, F.G., Ferro, V., & Pampalone, V. (2007). Hydraulic jumps on rough beds. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 133(9), 989-999.
Chanson, H. (2009). Turbulence generation in rough open channels. Environmental Fluid Mechanics, 9(4), 367-383.
Chanson, H. (2015). Hydraulic design of spillways. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 53(2), 128-139.
Daneshfaraz, R., Sadeghfam, S., & Ghaderi, A. (2020). Effect of block roughness on energy dissipation over ogee spillway. Water Supply, 20(5), 1789-1797.
Date, V., Sharma, R., & Jagtap, D. (2017). Computational fluid dynamics (CFD) analysis of ogee spillways using the volume of fluid (VOF) technique. Journal of Applied Mechanical Engineering, 6(4), Article 1000287.
Dey, S., Sarkar, S., & Bose, S.K. (2018). Characteristics of hydraulic jumps formed over rough channel beds. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 144(7), Article 04018037.
Esmaeili Varaki, M., & Razavizadeh, M. (2013). Analysis of hydraulic behavior in congressional shaped weirs. Water and Soil Science, 27(1), 224-234.
Ferrari, A. (2010). Simulation of free surface flow over sharp crested weirs using smoothed particle hydrodynamics (SPH). Advances in Water Resources, 33(2), 270-280.
Foroudi, F., Ghaderi, A., & Naghavi, M. (2013a). Estimation of discharge coefficients for ogee spillways using numerical modeling. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 51(4), 316-322.
Foroudi, F., Ghaderi, A., & Naghavi, M. (2013b). A comparative evaluation of discharge coefficients in ogee spillways. Hydraulic Structures and Design, 39(2), 121-133.
Hager, W.H. (1992). Energy dissipators and hydraulic jump. Springer Science & Business Media.
Haktanir, T., & Citakoglu, N. (2016). Development of an optimal computational model for estimating discharge over ogee spillways. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 58(5), 1013-1031.
Kumar, A., Tiwari, A.N., & Yadav, P. (2012). Flow characteristics of sharp crested weirs under axial arc conditions. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 138(11), 959-967.
Lee, J., & You, D. (2020). Machine learning applications in hydraulic flow prediction using CNNs and RNNs. Journal of Computational Physics, 412, Article 109423.
Morales, V.H., Rodríguez, D.A., & Zamora, D.C. (2012). Numerical analysis of ogee crest spillways using computational models. Water Resources Management, 26(14), 4113-4127.
Muzammil, M., & Kumar, V. (2016). Energy dissipation in hydraulic jumps. Procedia Engineering, 154, 1119-1125.
Pagliara, S., & Palermo, M. (2015). Hydraulic jumps on rough and smooth beds: Aggregate downstream water level prediction. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 53(2), 243-249.
Pandey, L., Kumar, A., & Singh, R. (2023). Impact of roughness and slope on hydraulic jump performance in open channels. International Journal of River Basin Management, 21(4), 567-580.
Rajaratnam, N. (1967). Hydraulic jumps. Annual Review of Fluid Mechanics, 1(1), 309-330.
Swamee, P.K., Shekhar, C.H., & Talib, M. (2011). Discharge characteristics of skew weirs. Journal of Hydraulic Research, 49(6), 817-820.
Tullis, B.P., & Neilson, J. (2008). Performance of submerged ogee crest weirs. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 134(4), 486-491.
Wu, S., & Rajaratnam, N. (1996). Impinging jet and hydraulic jump. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 122(5), 245-254.