Experimental Evaluation of Mechanical Properties of Alkali-Activated Blast Furnace Slag Concrete vs. Portland Cement in Hydraulic Structures

Document Type : Original Article

Author

Department of Civil Engineering, Chalous Branch, Islamic Azad University, Chalous, Iran.

Abstract

Improving the mechanical properties and durability of concrete used in hydraulic structures has always been of interest to civil engineers. In this paper, the mechanical properties of alkali-activated concrete (AAC) were evaluated compared to ordinary portland cement concrete (OPCC) for use in hydraulic structures. In this research paper, a mix design of OPCC containing 500 kg/m3 of Portland cement and a mix design of AAC containing granulated blast furnace slag (GBFS) were made. The mechanical properties of the designs were evaluated under compressive strength, tensile strength and elastic modulus tests at 7, 28 and 90 days of curing. The test results indicate that the performance improves with increasing curing age in concrete samples. In this regard, in OPCC, the highest compressive strength, tensile strength and elastic modulus were obtained at 90 days of curing age, respectively, with values of 64.92, 5.22 MPa and 33.73 GPa, which achieved 48.79, 89.13 and 21.85 percent improvement in results compared to 7 days of curing age. In AAC, the highest compressive strength, tensile strength and elastic modulus were obtained at the 90-day curing age, which were 72.33, 4.74 MPa and 39.11 GPa, respectively, which resulted in 10.93, 60.67 and 25.35 percent improvement in results compared to the 7-day curing age. At the 90-day curing age (as the optimal age), the performance of AAC in compressive strength, tensile strength and elastic modulus tests showed 11.41% improvement, 19.9% decrease and 15.95% improvement in results, respectively. The results obtained from scanning electron microscopy (SEM) analysis on concrete samples overlapped with other tests in this study.

Keywords


Abd Elaty, M. A. A. (2014). Compressive strength prediction of Portland cement concrete with age using a new model. HBRC Journal, 10(2), 145–155.
Allahverdi, A. L. I., Kani, E. N., & Yazdanipour, M. (2011). Effects of blast-furnace slag on natural pozzolan-based geopolymer cement. Ceramics–Silikáty, 55(1), 68–78.
Davidovits, J. (2008). Geopolymer chemistry and application (2nd ed.). Institut Géopolymère.
Deb, P., Nath, P., & Sarker, P. (2015). Drying shrinkage of slag blended fly ash geopolymer concrete cured at room temperature. Procedia Engineering, 125, 594–600.
Du, H., Du, S., & Liu, X. (2014). Durability performance of concrete with nano-silica. Construction and Building Materials, 73, 705–712.
Duan, P., Shui, Z., Chen, W., & Shen, C. (2013). Enhancing microstructure and durability of concrete from ground granulated blast furnace slag and metakaolin as cement replacement materials. Journal of Materials Research and Technology, 2(1), 52–59.
Ganesh, P., Ramachandra Murthy, A., Sundar Kumar, S., Mohammed Saffiq Reheman, M., & Iyer, N. R. (2016). Effect of nanosilica on durability and mechanical properties of high-strength concrete. Magazine of Concrete Research, 68(5), 229–236.
Hatami Zargaran, M. (2024). Examination of the influence of cut-off wall length on uplift forces in diversion dams (case study: Borj Dam). Journal of Hydraulic and Water Engineering, 2(1), 29–42. https://doi.org/10.22044/jhwe.2024.14105.1033
Jafari Nadoushan, M., & Ramezanianpor, A. (2019). Mechanical properties of alkali-activated slag pastes and determination of optimum values of effective factors. Amirkabir Journal of Civil Engineering, 50(6), 1043–1052. https://doi.org/10.22060/ceej.2017.11113.4977
Jorabloo, M., Sarbazi, N., & Aminian, P. (2024). Studying the impact of dam construction on the hydrologic regime in the Garmsar Plain. Journal of Hydraulic and Water Engineering, 2(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.22044/jhwe.2023.12568.1002
Kazemian, S., & Ghareh, S. (2017). Effects of cement, different bentonite, and aggregates on plastic concrete in Besh-Ghardash Dam, Iran. Journal of Testing and Evaluation, 45(1), 242–248.
Khalighi, F., Ahmadi, A., Keramat, A., & Tijsseling, A. (2024). A hybrid solution for transient pipe flow based on method of characteristics and Lax-Friedrichs scheme. Journal of Hydraulic and Water Engineering, 2(1), 13–28. https://doi.org/10.22044/jhwe.2024.13086.1015
Kim, J. K., Moon, Y. H., & Eo, S. H. (1998). Compressive strength development of concrete with different curing time and temperature. Cement and Concrete Research, 28(12), 1761–1773.
Madandoust, R., Bungey, J. H., & Ghayidel, R. (2012). Prediction of the concrete compressive strength by means of core testing using GMDH-type neural network and ANFIS models. Computational Materials Science, 51(1), 261–272.
Mansourghanaei, M., Biklaryan, M., & Mardookhpour, A. (2023). Experimental study of mechanical properties of slag geopolymer concrete under high temperature, used in road pavement. International Journal of Transportation Engineering, 11(1), 1371–1385.
Mansourghanaei, M., Biklaryan, M., & Mardookhpour, A. (2023). Experimental study of properties of green concrete based on geopolymer materials under high temperature. Civil Engineering Infrastructures Journal, 56(2), 365–379.
Mansourghanaei, M., Biklaryan, M., & Mardookhpour, A. (2024). Durability and mechanical properties of granulated blast furnace slag-based geopolymer concrete containing polyolefin fibres and nano silica. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering, 28(1), 209–219.
Mansourghanaei, M., & Mardookhpour, A. (2024). Analysis of the numerical results obtained from the experimental examination of the mechanical properties of geopolymer concrete. Numerical Methods in Civil Engineering, 9(1), 31–41.
Mehta, P. K., & Monteiro, P. J. (2014). Concrete: Microstructure, properties, and materials. McGraw-Hill Education.
Naderi, M., Valibeigi, R., & Mirsafi, S. M. (2018). Studying the effects kind of curing on strengths and permeability of concrete. Journal of Structural and Construction Engineering, 5(3), 106–123.
Neupane, N., Chalmers, D., & Kidd, P. (2018). High-strength geopolymer concrete—properties, advantages and challenges. Advances in Materials, 7(2), 15–25.
Nofallah, M. H. (2018). Effect of sodium hydroxide solution concentration and sodium silicate to sodium hydroxide ratio on the compressive strength and water absorption of slag-based alkali-activated concrete. Concrete Research, 11(2), 95–103.
Nosrati, A., Zandi, Y., Shariati, M., Khademi, K., Aliabad, M., Marto, A., & Khorami, M. (2018). Portland cement structure and its major oxides and fineness. Smart Structures and Systems, 22(2), 425–432.
Nuaklong, P., Sata, V., & Chindaprasirt, P. (2016). Influence of recycled aggregate on fly ash geopolymer concrete properties. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 2300–2307.
Pilehvar, S., DuyCao, V., M. Szczotok, A., Carmona, M., Valentini, L., Lanzón, M., & LenaKjøniksen, A. (2018). Physical and mechanical properties of fly ash and slag geopolymer concrete containing different types of micro-encapsulated phase change materials. Construction and Building Materials, 173, 28–39.
Pirmohammadi Alishah, F., & Mahmoudzadeh, N. (2020). Investigation of the effect of bentonite paste index on modulus of elasticity, compressive strength and performance of plastic concrete. Civil and Project, 2(5), 87–109.
Shirgir, B., Alizadeh, G. H., & Shirgir, V. (2017). An experimental study on the abrasion resistance of pervious concrete containing nano SiO2 in pavement.
Singh, B., Ishwarya, G., Gupta, M., & Bhattacharyya, S. K. (2015). Geopolymer concrete: A review of some recent developments. Construction and Building Materials, 85, 78–90.
Vora, P., & Urmil, V. D. (2013). Parametric studies on compressive strength of geopolymer concrete. Procedia Engineering, 51, 210–219.
Zhuang, X. Y., Chen, L., Komarneni, S., Zhou, C. H., Tong, D. S., Yang, H. M., ... & Wang, H. (2016). Fly ash-based geopolymer: Clean production, properties and applications. Journal of Cleaner Production, 125, 253–267.